github activity- jachym commented on pull request geopython/pygeoapi#800jachym commented on pull request geopython/pygeoapi#800 Oct 19, 2021 jachym commented Oct 19, 2021 hehe, I just copy&pasted the raster part. but fixed accordingly
- jachym pushed to 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapijachym pushed to 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapi Oct 19, 2021 1 commit to 799_raster_bbox 44f9fe2 fix 799 display raster bbox for different raster projections
- jachym pushed to 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapijachym pushed to 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapi Oct 18, 2021 1 commit to 799_raster_bbox e4f6ac4 fix 799 display raster bbox for different raster projections
- jachym opened a pull request in geopython/pygeoapijachym opened a pull request in geopython/pygeoapi Oct 18, 2021 fix 799 display raster bbox for different raster projections #800 fixes #799 +38 -154
- jachym created a branch 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapijachym created a branch in jachym/pygeoapi Oct 18, 2021 799_raster_bbox in jachym/pygeoapi Updated Oct 19
- jachym commented on pull request geopython/pygeoapi#800
2 Responses to “WFS 2.0 Client: slowly approaching”
I had tried the application, the GUI provided by HSLayers worked good. All the information is visible and accessing some menu options was not difficult. Thanks for the link, it helps me to test the client quick and easy.
By Fernanda Box on Mar 23, 2013
I’m wondering, it is still working….
By jachym on Mar 23, 2013